cosmeticstrio.blogg.se - Readcube papers review

#Readcube papers review how to
#Readcube papers review registration
#Readcube papers review portable

Are problems with plagiarism increasing?.

#Readcube papers review how to

How to ensure effective peer review regardless of timing.

Review for technical merit only example: PLOS One, ScienceOpen.

Post-publication peer review - citations, impact, PubMed Commons, Frontiers Review System, Retraction Watch, The Winnower, ScienceOpen.

Open peer review An Introduction to Open Peer Review examples: PubPeer, F1000 Research, some of the BMC journals, encouraged at PeerJ, Planned Obsolescence (open peer review and commentary on a book), DHThis, MediaCommons Press (several pubs), PRE-Peer Review Evaluation, Transparent Peer Review (I minute Youtube), Weighing Up Anonymity and Openness in Publication Peer Review, reviews several studies.

Mobile or independent peer review, examples: Peerage of Science, Rubriq, Axios Review, Libre, transferable peer review pilot at Wiley, PRE-Peer Review Evaluation, Cofactor (offers other editing and author services also).

Peer review, quality and impact transitions and experiments.

However, unlike SciHub, Dimensions content is provided via legal open access sources and institutional subscriptions.Open access is not the only thing changing in scholarly publishing and once you begin to talk about open access, most of the other issues are entangled in the discussion! Here are a few other issues. This type of seamless access parallels that of SciHub, where individuals can quickly access full-text content through illicit practices. Through a partnership with ReadCube Papers, it is possible to access, read, and save journal articles without having to leave the Dimensions platform.

#Readcube papers review portable

However, it is easier with Dimensions to see bigger picture activity occurring across research areas, institutions, and funders, and among researchers.Īnother feature that sets Dimensions apart from other databases is its ability to seamlessly connect one to full-text portable document format (PDF) articles. As with these databases, Dimensions provides citation metrics but expands these metrics to include altmetrics.ĭimensions lacks the precise advance searching of PubMed. Dimensions is similar to Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar in terms of indexing a wide range of content types across many research fields beyond biomedical sciences. Additionally, filters can be applied to limit the search to a specific researcher, publications directory source, journal title, or type of open access content.ĭimensions encompasses similar features that are available in other scholarly databases, although in this reviewer’s opinion, no single database is directly comparable. One can narrow results by publication year, fields of research, or publication type. Search results can be further refined through the use of filters. Search results can also be sorted by relevance, publication date, citations, or altmetric score.

#Readcube papers review registration

One has the option to perform different types of searches for example, one can search full-text data, titles, and abstracts or by digital object identifier (DOI).Įven though one is not required to create a user account with Dimensions to search the publications database, registration is required if one would like to save one’s searches as “Favorites” or export search results. The search techniques are not designed to be complex, so one can type in a topic, title, or author name into the main search box and quickly retrieve relevant information. Learning how to navigate the Dimensions publication database requires minimal time and effort. With altmetrics, it is possible to determine how many times an article was shared on a social media platform, news outlet, blog, or website.

Dimensions complements traditional metrics by partnering with Altmetric to leverage their alternative metrics or “altmetrics” data to reveal the amount of attention an individual article has received. Instead of promoting journal-level impact measures such as the journal impact factor, Dimensions incorporates article-level measures to demonstrate the influence of an article on its own terms, independent of where it was published.

Additionally, Dimensions includes the Field Citation Ratio and the Relative Citation Ratio, which attempt to determine the relative citation performance of an article compared to similar articles in the same field. Traditional metrics such as citation counts are available and are calculated from the reference list in all publications indexed by Dimensions. Dimensions integrates established metrics sources to demonstrate the impact, attention, and influence of a particular body of research among the academic and wider community.